Sachen    die Du echt haben musst

Agreement Of Past Participle In French

Composite past forms are verbs that require two parts, the auxiliary and the past part of the main life. For example, in the sentence I ate (I ate), have (have) the verb helping and ate (eaten) is the past participation of the main verb. 1. If there is a CSB other than the pronoun, the agreement shall be concluded only if that POSTB is before the verb. When we talk about a repeated act, customary in the past. In English, we often use the phrase „used to“ to provide this context. Laura Grace Tarpley is a writer and lives in Athens, Georgia. She has lived and explored for the past four years in France, New Zealand and China. She runs the blog Let`s Go Tarpley!, where she writes cheap travel guide and tips. In our example, the word cake is feminine in French, so if it becomes the pronoun „la“ or before the verb, you must add a last „e“ to the last part. Only by looking at the past (form of time) can you progress in your French studies.

Many people want to reject the direct object agreement – what do you think? Read the article and chat on Facebook: If you express something in the past using the compound past, you will need a support agreement between the topic and the last participation of the main editor. The most common option is to do the verb helping. Rule: If the object (here the pronoun) is available before the verb, you must follow it with the last partition. (the agreement does not exist with the subject, but with the direct object) In the previous section, we found that past participation corresponds to the theme of reflex verbs. But in fact, we could say that this corresponds to the direct object, because the purpose of a reflex verb is that the subject and the object are essentially „the same“. In a case like: As you know, French can be used for you to refer either to more than one person (plural you) or politely to a single person (you formal). In verben`s Compound Past (+ being), the agreement depends on your use: apply the rules of the agreement with a previous direct object pronoun. But we should certainly not worry about it, because we can ignore this rule in all conscience and we always agree with a French past with the pronoun.

But I thought it was worth another chance to understand how French is pushed to importance. Pronominal verbs are always conjugated with the auxiliary-being, but the rule applies to the concordance of past participation, as if it were conjugated with Avoir. The art of agreement is in turn to recognize the COD and the role of the reflex pronoun. The children saw each other in the ice. (The children looked at each other in the mirror.) [The breeder takes a direct object; therefore, the participation corresponds to it.] In general, past participation does not correspond to anything when the equity is used. For example, in the sentence below is the subject of the feminine plural and the direct object (the gift) is masculine plural, but no correspondence is added to the last purchased score: You have seen that in the forms of time assembled, such as The Compound Past, the majority of verbs are used as auxiliaries. See z.B. Regular verbs conjugated (+ have) in The Compound Past (past). For these verbs, past participation remains unchanged.

But it is different: When it comes to verbs used as auxiliaries in The Compound Past, such as conjugated comings and goings (+ being) in The Compound Past (past of conversation), the consegate, the dying, dying, becoming, remaining (+ being) in The Compound Past (silence of conversation) and the reflex verbs (+ being) conjugated in The Compound Past (past of conversation). In this case, you can overcome participations that end with a consonant and change their pronunciation. For example, embodying the correct conjugations for the French past — and all correct verbal agreements — can make the memory of past events even more painful.

Facebook Kommentar abgeben



No tags.